Re: Transaction Support in osWorkflow
Hani Suleiman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.open-symphony.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I'm somewhat against this. The ejb persistence layer provides tx management for free, and it seems somewhat silly to reinvent the wheel. On Monday, May 26, 2003, at 05:54 AM, Philipp Hug wrote: > Is anyone using transactions in osWorkflow? (except with ofbiz) > I'd like to add transaction functions to the persistence interface > (begin, > commit, rollback), so we could put some basic transaction > functionality into > BasicWorkflow and BasicWorkflowContext. > What do you think? > > philipp > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore. > If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a > relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore. > Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-developers > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore. If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore. Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge