Re: Transaction Support in osWorkflow

Hani Suleiman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.open-symphony.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I'm somewhat against this. The ejb persistence layer provides tx 
management for free, and it seems somewhat silly to reinvent the wheel.

On Monday, May 26, 2003, at 05:54 AM, Philipp Hug wrote:

> Is anyone using transactions in osWorkflow? (except with ofbiz)
> I'd like to add transaction functions to the persistence interface 
> (begin,
> commit, rollback), so we could put some basic transaction 
> functionality into
> BasicWorkflow and BasicWorkflowContext.
> What do you think?
>
> philipp
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
> If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a
> relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
> Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-developers
>



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a
relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.