Re: Is OSWorkflow in CVS (upcoming 2.5) usable and relatively stable?

Hani Suleiman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.open-symphony.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
As far as I know there are no major bugs in the current cvs tree (it's 
been waiting for Pat to get off his ass and release a 2.5 beta for 
months now). There will probably be big changes for the next major 
release (3.0), but that'll hopefully come with a migration guide.

On Tuesday, June 24, 2003, at 09:44 AM, Colin Sampaleanu wrote:

> We have an app currently using OSWorkflow 1.0, which is obviously 
> pretty outdated now. I have a bit of time available, and am thinking 
> about spending the time upgrading to 2.5.
>
> Can anybody comment on whether the CVS version is usable and generally 
> bug free (that is, there are not a large number of significant _known_ 
> bugs)? Additionally, can anybody comment on whether or not major 
> changes are still in the pipeline?
>
> Regards,
>
> Colin
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
> Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting 
> Partner.
> Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly 
> Commission!
> INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-developers
>



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission!
INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.