Re: Re: SiteMesh 2.0.1 rocks! :)

The single biggest hassle I (and my developers @ work) have had with OS 
stuff is the lack of up to date docs and details.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog:      http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/



[email protected] wrote on 15/12/2003 
07:52:08 PM:

> I've already started on getting the Velocity support ready, based on 
> some code that Victor wrote a year or three back. However realistically 
> it could be a while before I get the time to finish cleaning it up so 
> Mike if you do have time this week then drop me a line and I'll send 
> through what I have so far. Also note that this code doesn't solve 
> SIM-18, so maybe you could look at that one first?
> 
> Joe Walnes wsa talking about writing a JFlexParser. This has the 
> potential to be a LOT faster than the current FastPageParser, so I'm 
> quite looking forward to seeing this. Failing a JFlexParser, then I've 
> also got some ideas to make FastPageParser maybe 2-3x faster still, plus 

> almost completely eliminate all the (currently quite large) temporary 
> memory useage while parsing. This will take a lot of work however (it'll 

> be bordering on a complete rewrite) so I'm a bit reluctant to start that 

> until we know how fast/efficient the JFlexParser implementation will be.
> 
> One final thing we should look into. Lately I've seen quite a few posts 
> on various mailing lists and blogs by people stating that they prefer 
> Tiles over Sitemesh. Does anyone know what Tiles can do that Sitemesh 
> can't. Struts integration? (whatever that might mean). Perhaps it just 
> comes down to a lack of documentation? We should try to find out where 
> the (perceived?) problems are and address them with code and/or docs.
> 
> Chris
> 
> Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> > 
> > Just letting you know that I've tried SiteMesh 2.0.1 in our apps here
> > (upgraded from 1.5.x.CVS.sometime.built) and it's rocking. Definitely 
feels
> > faster and I haven't encountered any problems yet.
> > 
> > Congrats to Hani, Chris, Patrick, Mathias and anyone else who worked 
on it.
> > 
> > If I find time this week, I'm going to try to work on SIM-62 and 
SIM-18,
> > basically Velocity support for directives (ie #decorator) and also the
> > ability to make decorators in Velocity (currently the only JSP files 
in
> > Confluence are the decorators :)).
> > 
> > I guess these will go into SiteMesh 2.1? Do we have any other major 
items
> > planned for this release?
> > 
> > Also, I think we should add an i18n support page to the website - 
listing
> > exactly which containers support Sitemesh+i18n flawlessly (I know 
Resin has
> > some issues still)?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Mike 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
> > help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> > YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
> help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-developers



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/