Re: Question about Long versus long on Hibernate entities (USER-49)

I committed it without the Long change because last I remember, there 
was still disagreement from some people over whether that's the right 
thing to do.

Eric Pugh wrote:

> I noticed that USER-49 was committed, but without the id being a Long versus
> a long.  Are we going to just stick with long for the primary key then?
> Also, I was going through other Hibernate bugs related to OSUser and noticed
> that USER-41 has been made a duplicate of USER-49.  However, I don't seem to
> have the permissions to take the bug and close it.  We should go ahead and
> close it.
> 
> Eric
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
> Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
> See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
> http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-developers
> 



-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn