Re: Mixing AS1.0 and AS2.0 in the same webapp

ok, cool, thanks!  So, can i not just hit Servlet, using the gateway - or do
i have to what understand as a 'work-around' that you suggest?

Thanks.

Regards, Sam

On 20/02/06, Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> You only need access to the OpenAMF servlet. You can access other servlets
> calling proxy services in your backend (POJOs, EJB,...). The way you use RIA
> paradigm is very diferent to traditional web development with stateless
> clients, so is a must to "think RIA".
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> C.
>
>
> 2006/2/20, Sam Wootton <[email protected]>:
> >
> > So i did a little remoting with Java and Tomcat a while back, but gave
> > up becuase i found out openamf didn't support Servlets, is this still the
> > case?
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Regards, Sam
> >
> > On 17/02/06, Todd Hivnor <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I would like to create a single webapp, which contains 2 different
> > > Flash
> > > movies. Once uses AS1.0 and the other uses AS2.0, but both use
> > > OpenAMF.
> > > (Why? I'm working on converting from AS1.0 to AS2.0, and want to be
> > > able
> > > to deploy both while I work on the conversion.)
> > >
> > > In web.xml, I can define 2 different servlets. And each servlet can
> > > have
> > > its own OpenAMF config file, I've tried having 2 OpenAMF config files,
> > > one with force-lower-case-keys=true and the other with
> > > force-lower-case-keys=false. However, it seems that OpenAMF considers
> > > this "force-lower-case-keys" property to be global. I can't have it
> > > true
> > > for one servlet and false for another.
> > >
> > > I looked into the source code, and found that OpenAMFConfig is a
> > > singleton. That is, OpenAMFConfig.getInstance() always returns the
> > > same
> > > instance. I'm wondering if this could be changed. I may try to muck
> > > around with the code myself, but thought there might be some important
> > >
> > > reason why OpenAMFConfig should be a singleton. It seems to me that we
> > > should be able to have 1 OpenAMFConfig per Gateway Servlet.
> > >
> > > So: is there any structural reason why OpenAMFConfig should be a
> > > singleton?
> > >
> > > If not, I will try to make the change locally. If it works I will make
> > > a
> > > patch available. Perhaps it can go into the main source tree.
> > >
> > > - Todd
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
> > > files
> > > for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> > > searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD
> > > SPLUNK!
> > > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Openamf-user mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openamf-user
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> ::| Carlos Rovira
> ::| http://www.carlosrovira.com