Re: Mixing AS1.0 and AS2.0 in the same webapp

You should only have one acess point (the openamf gateway servlet) to route
your requests and think that 99'9999% in a RIA you don't need access to
session objects (because you have a stateful client, although you have the
RequestContext) or other things related to traditional web development where
you need the servlet paradigm. Here you can *talk* directly with any service
that you make accesible, so why make things more complicated?



2006/2/20, Sam Wootton <[email protected]>:
>
> ok, cool, thanks!  So, can i not just hit Servlet, using the gateway - or
> do i have to what understand as a 'work-around' that you suggest?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards, Sam
>
> On 20/02/06, Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > You only need access to the OpenAMF servlet. You can access other
> > servlets calling proxy services in your backend (POJOs, EJB,...). The way
> > you use RIA paradigm is very diferent to traditional web development with
> > stateless clients, so is a must to "think RIA".
> >
> > Hope that helps.
> >
> > C.
> >
> >
> > 2006/2/20, Sam Wootton <[email protected] >:
> > >
> > > So i did a little remoting with Java and Tomcat a while back, but gave
> > > up becuase i found out openamf didn't support Servlets, is this still the
> > > case?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance.
> > >
> > > Regards, Sam
> > >
> > > On 17/02/06, Todd Hivnor <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I would like to create a single webapp, which contains 2 different
> > > > Flash
> > > > movies. Once uses AS1.0 and the other uses AS2.0, but both use
> > > > OpenAMF.
> > > > (Why? I'm working on converting from AS1.0 to AS2.0, and want to be
> > > > able
> > > > to deploy both while I work on the conversion.)
> > > >
> > > > In web.xml, I can define 2 different servlets. And each servlet can
> > > > have
> > > > its own OpenAMF config file, I've tried having 2 OpenAMF config
> > > > files,
> > > > one with force-lower-case-keys=true and the other with
> > > > force-lower-case-keys=false. However, it seems that OpenAMF
> > > > considers
> > > > this "force-lower-case-keys" property to be global. I can't have it
> > > > true
> > > > for one servlet and false for another.
> > > >
> > > > I looked into the source code, and found that OpenAMFConfig is a
> > > > singleton. That is, OpenAMFConfig.getInstance() always returns the
> > > > same
> > > > instance. I'm wondering if this could be changed. I may try to muck
> > > > around with the code myself, but thought there might be some
> > > > important
> > > > reason why OpenAMFConfig should be a singleton. It seems to me that
> > > > we
> > > > should be able to have 1 OpenAMFConfig per Gateway Servlet.
> > > >
> > > > So: is there any structural reason why OpenAMFConfig should be a
> > > > singleton?
> > > >
> > > > If not, I will try to make the change locally. If it works I will
> > > > make a
> > > > patch available. Perhaps it can go into the main source tree.
> > > >
> > > > - Todd
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through
> > > > log files
> > > > for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> > > > searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD
> > > > SPLUNK!
> > > > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Openamf-user mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openamf-user
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ::| Carlos Rovira
> > ::| http://www.carlosrovira.com
>
>
>


--
::| Carlos Rovira
::| http://www.carlosrovira.com