[ openjms-Feature Requests-960681 ] high throughput using prevayler persistence?
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> Fri, 02 Jul 2004 21:24:29 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.openjms.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Feature Requests item #960681, was opened at 2004-05-26 19:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tanderson You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=474139&aid=960681&group_id=54559 Category: enhancement Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Edward Chu (edward_chee) >Assigned to: Tim Anderson (tanderson) Summary: high throughput using prevayler persistence? Initial Comment: Hi there Just wondering if anyone has given thought to using prevayler as the persistence layer. Prevayler serializes writes to a log file on disk. It also caches java objects in memory. For JMS apps focussed on high throughput, I'm thinking that prevayler might be able to give a large performance boost. For example, it claims 3000x performance boost compared to MySQL for queries. See http://www.prevayler.org/wiki.jsp Thanks edward ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Anderson (tanderson) Date: 2004-07-03 14:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=557161 No. We're moving towards supporting only JDBC based persistent solutions. Prevayler also seems to require all persistent objects to be able to reside in memory - not applicable to applications such as OpenJMS where the no. of persistent objects is dynamic. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=474139&aid=960681&group_id=54559 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com