Re: nameObject performance

Do object creation on the server side instead. See the FAQ for more info.

Regards,
Per
torsdagen den 9 december 2004 21.22 skrev Thomas Dingler:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi list,
>
> I have a database with about 100k objects (5megabyte) stored. When I
> create new objects, I use
>
> createObject(java.lang.String  className,
>                                 int access,
>                                 java.lang.String objName)
>
> This call takes on my machine (external database, running on localhost,
> 4Ghz)
> about 5 seconds, even on very easy objects.
>
> I splitted the call into createObject(className) and nameObject(obj,
> name) and
> realised, that the creatObject call takes less than a second, but the
> nameObject takes more than 4 seconds.
>
> Any ideas but not using names ;-) ?
>
> tnx,
>
> Thomas Dingler
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP 8.1
>
> iQA/AwUBQbiz7rn0SLup8M1VEQIVWgCePPW3Bii7m8oYONPZ25ZDMLk5tmIAn1kj
> oLSw4T3cG140YR7Tm9CZFUKI
> =5z+p
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Ozone-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ozone-users


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/