Re: [picocontainer-dev] FW: [picocontainer] [3121] java/nanocontainer-nanowar/trunk: Split nanowar into core and separate modules for each framework supported.

Konstantin Priblouda wrote:
> --- Jörg Schaible <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> Well, how often do you use two of those at same
>> time? 
> 
> never ;)
> 
>> And if you do, then it is no problem to
>> declare two deps ... or?
> 
> with m2 this is not even that - transient dependencies
> rule ;) 
> 
> placing everything is single project would lead (
> under m2 ) to additional unnecessary dependencies,
> landing automatically in war. ( to other frameworks ) 
> 
> ok, this can be prevented by making them optional, but
> then users must declare them again ( though they
> usually would declare such framework dependency 
> anyway ) 
> 

Ok - seems there is consensus then:  if no one objects as part of the move to m2, I'll then start 
splitting the nanocontainer modules as well.

The core-core + one module per scripting language + an AOP module?
Perhaps the XML should be left as default in core.

Cheers



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email