Re: [picocontainer-dev] FW: [picocontainer] [3121] java/nanocontainer-nanowar/trunk: Split nanowar into core and separate modules for each framework supported.
Konstantin Priblouda <kpriblouda-/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- Mauro Talevi <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok - seems there is consensus then: if no one > objects as part of the move to m2, I'll then start > splitting the nanocontainer modules as well. m2 is cool. if you know how to cook it ;) > The core-core + one module per scripting language + > an AOP module? > Perhaps the XML should be left as default in core. well this woul boil down to following dependencies: - core nanowar - scripting support - chains - particular framework integration core nanowar would be transitive dependency then and does not need to be specified explicitely. regards, ----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]---------------- Still using XDoclet 1.x? XDoclet 2 is released and of production quality. check it out: http://xdoclet.codehaus.org __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email