Re: [picocontainer-dev] Pico/Nano Releases

Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Michael Rimov wrote:
> 
>> (Note to self: I've got to stop deleting threads... I keep thinking of a
>> response two hours later!)  :D
>>
>> Since Nano (and everything based on it) still lists Pico 1.2 as a
>> dependency, why don't we release Pico 1.3 first (especially since it
>> doesn't rely on groovy).  Then we take a moment or two to get the new
>> version propagated to Nano just to make sure there aren't any surprises.
>>
>> Then we can release Nano once Groovy is out.
> 
> That was, what Mauro proposed. He simply stated that we don't have to
> release Pico 1.3, since nothing in Nano makes usage of features/additions
> in Pico 1.3, but a M2 based build would make sense. ;-)

Pico 1.3 is m2-based.  Or perhaps you meant something else here ...




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email