Re: [picocontainer-dev] Pico/Nano Releases
Jörg Schaible <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Michael Rimov wrote:
> (Note to self: I've got to stop deleting threads... I keep thinking of a
> response two hours later!) :D
>
> Since Nano (and everything based on it) still lists Pico 1.2 as a
> dependency, why don't we release Pico 1.3 first (especially since it
> doesn't rely on groovy). Then we take a moment or two to get the new
> version propagated to Nano just to make sure there aren't any surprises.
>
> Then we can release Nano once Groovy is out.
That was, what Mauro proposed. He simply stated that we don't have to
release Pico 1.3, since nothing in Nano makes usage of features/additions
in Pico 1.3, but a M2 based build would make sense. ;-)
- Jörg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email