Re: [picocontainer-dev] annotations and comments on Pico2
Konstantin Priblouda <kpriblouda-/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- "Putrycz, Erik" <[email protected]> wrote: > Konstantin, not sure what you mean by > "unflexibility". And do you mean > you rather would not have any annotations in the > container? I have 2 main objections to use of annotation for wiring configuration 1. they introduce dependency on container ( which is kind of uncool ) 2. they are compiled into classes and can not be changed afterwards. This can be solved by second externalisable configuration system - and what value do they have afterwards? regards, ----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]---------------- JTec quality components: http://www.pribluda.de/projects/ ____________________________________________________________________________________Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email