Re: [picocontainer-dev] annotations and comments on Pico2

Konstantin Priblouda <kpriblouda-/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--- "Putrycz, Erik" <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Konstantin, not sure what you mean by
> "unflexibility". And do you mean
> you rather would not have any annotations in the
> container?

I have 2 main objections to use of annotation for
wiring configuration

1. they introduce dependency on container ( which is 
kind of uncool ) 

2. they are compiled into classes and can not be
changed afterwards. This can be solved by second
externalisable configuration system - and what value 
do they have afterwards? 

regards,

----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]----------------
JTec quality components: http://www.pribluda.de/projects/


       
____________________________________________________________________________________Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. 
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.