Re: [picocontainer-dev] annotations and comments on Pico2

Konstantin, Erik,

I have the same objections, but I've coded an  
AnnotationInjectionComponentAdapterFactory for Pico2.  It uses @Inject.

Of course its optional, and I recommend not to use it, but its there :-)

I refactored SetterInjectionComponentAdapter to have an overidable  
isInjectorMethod method.

- Paul

On May 19, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Konstantin Priblouda wrote:

>
> --- "Putrycz, Erik" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Konstantin, not sure what you mean by
>> "unflexibility". And do you mean
>> you rather would not have any annotations in the
>> container?
>
> I have 2 main objections to use of annotation for
> wiring configuration
>
> 1. they introduce dependency on container ( which is
> kind of uncool )
>
> 2. they are compiled into classes and can not be
> changed afterwards. This can be solved by second
> externalisable configuration system - and what value
> do they have afterwards?
>
> regards,


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email