Re: [picocontainer-dev] Better CAF handling

Paul Hammant wrote:
> ( so I agree in the end with others on keeping 'ComponentAdapter' naming 
> as is - it is for more advanced people )

+1

> That said, I've dropped to Adapter only for the following discussion 
> that Erik started some days ago.  Which do y'all like best :-
> 
> 
>         MutablePicoContainer mpc = new 
> PicoBuilder().withWithCaching().withThreadSafety().withHiddenImplementations().withSetterInjection().build(); 
> 
> 
>         MutablePicoContainer mpc = new 
> PicoBuilder().withAdapters(caching().of().madeThreadSafe().of().hiddenImplementations().of().setterInjection()).build(); 
> 
> 
>         MutablePicoContainer mpc = new 
> PicoBuilder().withAdapters(CACHING, THREADSAFE, IMPL_HIDING, CDI).build();
> 
> or some other builder style design .. ?
> 

First build syntax is clearest IMO


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email