RE: [picocontainer-dev] Better CAF handling

Paul Hammant wrote on Wednesday, May 23, 2007 10:10 PM:

> ( so I agree in the end with others on keeping 'ComponentAdapter'
> naming as is - it is for more advanced people )
> 
> That said, I've dropped to Adapter only for the following discussion
> that Erik started some days ago.  Which do y'all like best :-
> 
> 
>          MutablePicoContainer mpc = new PicoBuilder().withWithCaching
> ().withThreadSafety().withHiddenImplementations().withSetterInjection
> ().build(); 
> 
>          MutablePicoContainer mpc = new PicoBuilder().withAdapters
> (caching().of().madeThreadSafe().of().hiddenImplementations().of
> ().setterInjection()).build();
> 
>          MutablePicoContainer mpc = new PicoBuilder().withAdapters
> (CACHING, THREADSAFE, IMPL_HIDING, CDI).build();
> 
> or some other builder style design .. ?

How about:

MutablePicoContainer mpc = new PicoBuilder() {{
	useSetterInjection(); // this is the factory !!
	addThreadSafety();
	addHiddenImplementations();
	addCaching();
}}.build(); 

jMock2 syntax. 

- Jörg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email