Re: [picocontainer-dev] CAF chaining #2
"Nick Sieger" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 5/29/07, Paul Hammant <[email protected]> wrote: > CAFs a chained via a DecoratingCAF as usual, but now there is a > setter in the mix rather than a ctor. > > public interface DecoratingComponentAdapterFactory { > AbstractDecoratingComponentAdapterFactory forThis > (ComponentAdapterFactory delegate); > } > > 'for' would have been great as a method name, but is not allowed. > > Which of > > to > on > with > chain > > is better than forThis ? What's an example of usage? I think you showed it once before, but I'm not seeing it in the context right now. /Nick --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email