Re: [picocontainer-dev] CAF chaining #2

"Nick Sieger" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 5/29/07, Paul Hammant <[email protected]> wrote:
> CAFs a chained via a DecoratingCAF as usual, but now there is a
> setter in the mix rather than a ctor.
>
>    public interface DecoratingComponentAdapterFactory {
>        AbstractDecoratingComponentAdapterFactory forThis
> (ComponentAdapterFactory delegate);
>    }
>
> 'for' would have been great as a method name, but is not allowed.
>
> Which of
>
>    to
>    on
>    with
>    chain
>
> is better than forThis ?

What's an example of usage?  I think you showed it once before, but
I'm not seeing it in the context right now.

/Nick

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.