Re: [picocontainer-dev] caf chaining in builder (done)

On 5/29/07, Paul Hammant <[email protected]> wrote:
> MutablePicoContainer mpc = new PicoBuilder
> ().withComponentAdapterFactories(CACHING(), IMPL_HIDING(), SDI
> ()).build()
>
> They are in caps cos they are public static methods (thankfully
> stateless).
>
> Thoughts on the following ?
>
>     withComponentAdapterFactories() versus withFactories()
>    CACHING() versus caching() cache() singletons() singleInstances()
> cached()
>    IMPL_HIDING() versus HIDDEN() hidden() hide() hideThem()

A stretch, but what about "withFeatures"?  I understand it's
introducing new terminology...

new PicoBuilder().withFeatures(singletons(), implHiding());

/Nick

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email