Re: [picocontainer-dev] argumentative pico container -> to commons-cli?

Konstantin Priblouda <kpriblouda-/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--- Paul Hammant <[email protected]> wrote:

> No objection for a second commons-cli thing to
> arrive in gems, but I  
> prefer the simple APC to stay where it is with no
> change :-)

I started with properties backed container first ->
it would be "base" for cli-based

> We'll, not that I want to be seen to endorse
> anything that has a  
> mandatory dependency on commons-logging ;-)

Do you know alternative? I'm pretty open on it.

regards,

----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]----------------
JTec quality components: http://www.pribluda.de/projects/


       
____________________________________________________________________________________Ready for the edge of your seat? 
Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. 
http://tv.yahoo.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.