Re: [picocontainer-dev] Parameter names

--- Paul Hammant <[email protected]> wrote:

> The intention is to consume the 18K paranamer jar
> into Pico's jar.
> 
> Maven has a 'Shade' plugin to facilitate this. I
> can't quite get it  
> working though.
> 
> Does this make the parameter-name more attractive
> for core ?

my porblem with paranamer is that it requires 
processing of classes to be managed to be usefull. 
while it is a cool idea, this feature it is not in SE
and will not enter it for years.
(even if it comes into SE, industry will be as always
slow to adopt this) 

to use formal parameter names, they also have to be
documented and meaningfull.

yeat another 18K bytecode will do not much harm,
but I doubt cor eis aright place for it. 

regards,

----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]----------------
JTec quality components: http://www.pribluda.de/projects/


       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow  

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email