RE: [picocontainer-dev] do we have remoting behaviour?
Jörg Schaible <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Konstantin Priblouda wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just no quite grok what pico/nano offers for
> remoting.
> ( well, I see nanocontainer-remoting, but do not grok
> what is it up to )
>
> Do we have simple RMI component adapter, which
> just provides dependency out of class / url?
>
> If not, why?
> (I would like to kick any spring dependency out of my
>
> current project)
nano-remoting consists/constisted of 3 parts: EJB client supprt, JMX support and RMI support. I used the first two in real world scenarios, the RMI part was originally Aslak's sandbox, don't know its state.
- Jörg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email