Re: [picocontainer-dev] do we have remoting behaviour?

JRemoting is nearing completion. It should be a robust, recovering  
transparent RMI (pluggable transports, pluggable encoding designs).

Take a look ....

   svn co http://svn.codehaus.org/jremoting/jremoting/trunk

It does not have a ComponentAdapter, but could do easily.

- Paul

On Feb 21, 2008, at 5:38 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:

> Konstantin Priblouda wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I just no quite grok what pico/nano offers for
>> remoting.
>> ( well, I see nanocontainer-remoting, but do not grok
>> what is it up to )
>>
>> Do we have simple RMI component adapter, which
>> just provides dependency out of class / url?
>>
>> If not, why?
>> (I would like  to kick any spring dependency out of my
>>
>> current project)
>
> nano-remoting consists/constisted of 3 parts: EJB client supprt, JMX  
> support and RMI support. I used the first two in real world  
> scenarios, the RMI part was originally Aslak's sandbox, don't know  
> its state.
>
> - Jörg
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email