Re: [picocontainer-dev] Moving towards a Nano 2.x release

Paul Hammant wrote:

>> +10! :)  Perhaps we can drop Hibernate 3.0 as well?  (Not Hibernate 3.2 +
>> Annotations, just hibernate 3).  As of this August, it will be a 3 
>> year old
>> release according to file timestamp:
>>
>> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/hibernate/hibernate/3.0/
> 
> Agree.

As noted in previous response, we already support 3.2 in hibernate module.

>> I'm for trimming the codebase, although I think recently there was 
>> somebody
>> looking to integrate webwork on the mailing lists (< 6 months ago IIRC?)
> 
> Well both the WebWork and the Struts team would suggest that their best 
> practice would be to move to Struts2.
> 

Yes - we should consider struts2 support as a replacement for struts1 
and webwork*.

> Well work towards that if you like dude.
> 
> I'm thinking that Waffle is the direction I'd like to head in as the 
> approved web-framework for Pico.
> 
> and maybe we could beef up the web-frameworks.html page with a "roll 
> your own" section ?

I'm with Paul here - but nothing prevents other implementations.  Let's 
just make sure it's not just a play toolbox, which could go into an 
example section rather than released code.  I mean - do you intend to 
use this extra-lightweight implementation or know anybody who would?

Cheers


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email