Re: [picocontainer-dev] Moving towards a Nano 2.x release

Paul Hammant wrote:

> I'd love Jython to be further advanced.  It's an uphill struggle for 
> that team though - http://testabilityexplorer.org/jython/jython/2.1
> Correspondingly they have few test-cases.
> 

By contrast: http://testabilityexplorer.org/waffle/waffle-core/1.0 :-)

Anyway, let's have a look at jython again and see if we are able to 
support it effectively in Pico 2.x

> 
> Nope. just that the one that's closest to Pico's semantics is Waffle.
> 
> Don;t get me wrong - I'm encouraging of an even-lighter web framework :
> 
>    find AddToCartAction in page 
> http://paulhammant.com/blog/what-brought-me-to-inversion-of-control-in-the-first-place.html
> 
> That 'boot' code is Ruby by the way.
> 

One thing is proving that it can be done, another is supporting it as a 
released component/framework.  I'm not against alternative 
implementations at all, just let's get the balance right.

> How about - MyTinyPicoServlet 
> from http://picocontainer.org/web-frameworks.html evolved into something 
> not quite so small.
> 
> Or if you abandon web.xml and Sun's notion of containment, use the 
> somethng 
> from http://svn.codehaus.org/picocontainer/java/2.x/trunk/nano/webcontainer/src/test/org/nanocontainer/webcontainer/ 
> as this is very much in PicoContainer's future.




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email