Re: [picocontainer-dev] Moving towards a Nano 2.x release

Mauro Talevi <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Paul,
> 
> what about dynaop now? I don't like the idea of a Nano release based on a dynaop version that is not officially available nor tagged.
> 

I agree - it should not be release with unreleased version.

We can postpone the release of the aop module if dynaop can't be 
released soon.  But more in general, what about moving to aspectj?

Cheers




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.