Re: [picocontainer-dev] Moving towards a Nano 2.x release

Yeah yeah,

I'll give CrazyBob a call today.

Did i tell y'all that in DynAOP's CVS codebase is a precursor to  
Guice?  Its not complete, but is a move from 'aop framework' to  
'dependency injection framework'

- Paul

On May 20, 2008, at 7:27 AM, Mauro Talevi wrote:

> Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Paul,
>> what about dynaop now? I don't like the idea of a Nano release  
>> based on a dynaop version that is not officially available nor  
>> tagged.
>
> I agree - it should not be release with unreleased version.
>
> We can postpone the release of the aop module if dynaop can't be  
> released soon.  But more in general, what about moving to aspectj?
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email