Re: [picocontainer-dev] Trying an experiment to kill off ContainerRecorder (Nano)
Konstantin Priblouda <kpriblouda-/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- Paul Hammant <[email protected]> wrote: > Here's another patch. This one builds and passes > tests, but I think > the tests need work - things are quite different > now. > > We need to ensure that only one container is made > per scope ... for > the entire life of the web application. > > I'd love someone else to take a look. Someone who's > familiar with the > NanoWar architecture. This someone must be me... I will throw a look to night. Container recorder is only needed to speed up initializing ofleaf containers - so if there a better solution it can go for good. regards, ----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]---------------- JTec quality components: http://www.pribluda.de/projects/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email