Re: [picocontainer-dev] Trying an experiment to kill off ContainerRecorder (Nano)

Konstantin Priblouda <kpriblouda-/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--- Paul Hammant <[email protected]> wrote:

> Here's another patch.  This one builds and passes
> tests, but I think  
> the tests need work - things are quite different
> now.
> 
> We need to ensure that only one container is made
> per scope ... for  
> the entire life of the web application.
> 
> I'd love someone else to take a look. Someone who's
> familiar with the  
> NanoWar architecture.


This someone must be me...  I will throw a look
to night. Container recorder is only needed to speed
up
initializing ofleaf containers - so if there  a better
solution it can go for good. 

regards,

----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]----------------
JTec quality components: http://www.pribluda.de/projects/


      

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.