RE: [picocontainer-dev] Trying an experiment to kill off ContainerRecorder (Nano)

> > Here's another patch.  This one builds and passes
> > tests, but I think
> > the tests need work - things are quite different
> > now.
> >
> > We need to ensure that only one container is made
> > per scope ... for
> > the entire life of the web application.
> >
> > I'd love someone else to take a look. Someone who's
> > familiar with the
> > NanoWar architecture.
> 
> 
> This someone must be me...  I will throw a look
> to night. Container recorder is only needed to speed
> up
> initializing ofleaf containers - so if there  a better
> solution it can go for good.

Hi Konstanin,

Hey, perhaps we can do a combination of storage + the new ReusablePicoContainer
for the leaf containers.  (I've never envisioned it for anything but
Request-level Containers anyway).  

Paul has a "HttpSessionStoring" behavior solution, but we need to flesh it out
for handling instance registrations, but if we get around that hurdle, I'd be
happy too. :)

							-Mike



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email