[picocontainer-dev] (Re)Leaning what the old NanoWar did ..

Paul Hammant <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
NanoWarSessionListener I think is key to the big change.

In the old design, it was this that placed (with setAttribute)  
containers in ServletContext (app) HttpSession (session) and  
ServletRequest (req) .

This isn't the new way.  Instead the three containers are set up once,  
and only the Store's for session and request are tinkered with at  
various moments.

Thus, I think NanoWarSessionListener should be deleted.  And we do it  
more the way of :  http://svn.codehaus.org/picocontainer/java/2.x/trunk/nanoextras/struts2/picocontainer-struts2/src/main/java/org/picocontainer/struts2/

Thoughts?

- Paul 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.