RE: [picocontainer-dev] Trying an experiment to kill off ContainerRecorder (Nano)

> Instance components for session level is not something I thought of
> with the ThreadLocal/Storing thing.
> 
> If application level, then regular caching is the strategy
> 
> Request level, in-theory, a no-caching and no-storing CA would still
> cache instance registrations.

Right, and it was forcing me to completely rebuild the container with each
servlet request.  (I don't use Session level Container)

> 
> Where do you use instance registrations dude ?

//Example...
public class Action {

	public Action(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response)
{
		//.....
	}
}

pico.addComponent(Action.class);
pico.addComponent(HttpServletRequest.class, request);
pico.addComponent(HttpServletResponse.class, response);
pico.addComponent(HttpSession.class, request.getSession(true));
Action action = pico.getComponent(Action.class);

								-Mike



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email