Re: [picocontainer-dev] While looking at the streamlining of NanoWar ...
Konstantin Priblouda <kpriblouda-/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all,
At themoment I'm quite silent, but I follow
the discussion closely.
Thread local is really dangerous - webservers
do reuse threads. I got bitten in my ass more than
once.
BTW, do we need nanowar at all? It's kind of spring
way to try to provide everything and kitchen sink.
3-Tier container hierarchy is a good thing, and
WW/S2 can profit from it.
But nanowar itself offers really poor functionality
compared to XW / WW / S2 - or doyou like to
reimplement parameter handling / conversion /
propagation,
validation, i18n, templating etc.?
regards,
----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]----------------
JTec quality components: http://www.pribluda.de/projects/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email