Re: [picocontainer-dev] While looking at the streamlining of NanoWar ...

Konstantin,

>
> At themoment I'm quite silent, but I follow
> the discussion closely.
>
> Thread local is really dangerous - webservers
> do reuse threads. I got bitten in my ass more than
> once.
>

The idea is to retrieve the the right store for the session in a  
filter, and set it for the duration of the request, invalidating it at  
the end of the doFilter.  It should even work for multiple concurrent  
requests for the same session.

>
> BTW, do we need nanowar at all?  It's kind of spring
> way to try to provide everything and kitchen sink.
> 3-Tier container hierarchy is a good thing, and
> WW/S2 can profit from it.
>
> But nanowar itself offers really poor functionality
> compared to XW / WW / S2 - or doyou like to
> reimplement parameter handling / conversion /
> propagation,
> validation, i18n, templating etc.?
>

when I say NanoWar I mean all thos in the same group (WW, WW2, S, S2  
etc) :-)

- Paul