Re: [picocontainer-dev] FW: Picoweb sessionContainerholder

It had and I believe Paul was intending to take a look at the issue over 
a long flight.

Cheers

Michael Rimov wrote:
> I completely forget if this actually made it to the list.  We were have some reverse DNS problems so most of our mail wasn't getting accepted over the internet.   So I'm resending just in case.  If I already posted this, my apologies.
> 							
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Rimov [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2008 6:00 PM
> To: 'dev-qxt/[email protected]'
> Subject: Picoweb sessionContainerholder
> 
> Hi guys!
>  
> I'm still spelunking picocontainer-web trying to get my head around the code.  I was wondering something: 
> 
> Why is SessionContainerHolder.lifecycleState threadlocal?
> 
> Wouldn't that mean that the lifecycle state got lost in subsequent requests by the client?  (Assuming that the client 
> gets serviced by a different thread.)
> 
> Since the SessionContainerHolder instance is stored within the Session, isn't that sufficient identity?
> Thanks,
>  
>       			-Mike (R)
>  
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> 
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> 
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email