Re: [picocontainer-dev] Picoweb sessionContainerholder
Paul Hammant <[email protected]> Tue, 16 Sep 2008 12:15:19 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Look in PicoServletContainerListener dude.
.start() .stop() and .dispose() are called for new/dead context and
new/dead session at the right moments
ThreadLocal is used to during the web request only. At the start of
the web request a the right session set of components are set up.
- Paul
(am back from vacation now)
On Sep 6, 2008, at 5:59 PM, Michael Rimov wrote:
> Hi guys!
>
> I'm still spelunking picocontainer-web trying to get my head around
> the code. I was wondering something:
>
> Why is SessionContainerHolder.lifecycleState threadlocal?
>
> Wouldn't that mean that the lifecycle state got lost in subsequent
> requests by the client? (Assuming that the client
> gets serviced by a different thread.)
>
> Since the SessionContainerHolder instance is stored within the
> Session, isn't that sufficient identity?
> Thanks,
>
> -Mike (R)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email