Re: Type-safe Prevayler, using generics
Karl Wettin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.prevayler |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
5 nov 2011 kl. 00.27 skrev Justin T. Sampson: > On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Drop Skaringa rather than having multiple factories. > > > > Not sure I agree about that. > > Why not? Anyone use Skaringa? Is the value of having that option there > more important than simplicity, elegance, ease of learning and > avoiding these recurring "what about skaringa?" discussions? > > I lean toward dropping Skaringa. Carrying the dependency is an unnecessary cost for Prevayler, whereas it's trivial for users to resurrect it if they really want it. Oh, Skaringa. In my head I read XStream. I did that because _Skaringa_was_already_dropped_in 2.5_ due to no release on Maven central that worked for us without rewriting all the code. karl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe go to the end of this page: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/prevayler-discussion _______________________________________________ "Databases in Memoriam" -- http://www.prevayler.org