Re: Type-safe Prevayler, using generics

Yes, I would keep XStream.

I dont think we should type things as Serializable because XStream,
for one, does not require classes to be declared Serializable. That's
why I use XStream and not Java serialization.

See you, Klaus.


On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Karl Wettin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> 5 nov 2011 kl. 00.27 skrev Justin T. Sampson:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> Drop Skaringa rather than having multiple factories.
>> >
>> > Not sure I agree about that.
>>
>> Why not? Anyone use Skaringa? Is the value of having that option there
>> more important than simplicity, elegance, ease of learning and
>> avoiding these recurring "what about skaringa?" discussions?
>>
>> I lean toward dropping Skaringa. Carrying the dependency is an unnecessary cost for Prevayler, whereas it's trivial for users to resurrect it if they really want it.
>
> Oh, Skaringa. In my head I read XStream. I did that because _Skaringa_was_already_dropped_in 2.5_ due to no release on Maven central that worked for us without rewriting all the code.
>
>
>                karl
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> RSA(R) Conference 2012
> Save $700 by Nov 18
> Register now
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe go to the end of this page: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/prevayler-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> "Databases in Memoriam" -- http://www.prevayler.org
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe go to the end of this page: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/prevayler-discussion
_______________________________________________
"Databases in Memoriam" -- http://www.prevayler.org