Re: ACIDity of Prevayler 2.6
Robert Friberg <[email protected]> Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:22:08 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.prevayler |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <04CBB7B6F20119479B70F3ED635574013CFF6040@AMSPRD0410MB386.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> |
There are pros and cons of both approaches, so how about multiple implementations based on a simple strategy pattern? The excellent immutable system suggestion could be supported as well. Imo, a framework should have some degree of flexibility supporting a range of different requirements, scenarios and workloads. Robert Friberg http://about.me/robertfriberg From: Karl Wettin [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: den 10 december 2012 11:24 To: Open discussion about the Prevayler project. Subject: Re: [Prevayler-discussion] ACIDity of Prevayler 2.6 6 dec 2012 kl. 21:59 skrev Justin T. Sampson: Should the food taster be restored for the next release? I'd say no, but it's not up to me. Public vote? I like the RollbackMarker suggested by Robert. It's simple enough and solves the problem for everybody. In fact it might even be easier to implement than to revert to food taster. karl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe go to the end of this page: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/prevayler-discussion _______________________________________________ "Databases in Memoriam" -- http://www.prevayler.org