Re: ACIDity of Prevayler 2.6

10 dec 2012 kl. 12:22 skrev Robert Friberg:

> Imo, a framework should have some degree of flexibility supporting a range of different requirements, scenarios and workloads.

The source code is right there, people are free to implement what ever solution they need. ; )

But seriously, thinking about what I just wrote in my previous sentence, I suppose it means nobody really built a system using Prevayler that truly depend on rollbacks. People would have complained a lot more if they did. They would have said that removal of the food taster it's a show stopper for their existing application. Nobody here said such a thing. I think the closest we got to that this time was people stating that other people they know fear using Prevayler if it lacks a rollback feature.

If this assessment is true, then I feel even less positive towards adding such features in Prevayler. It's spending time on stuff that will not be used, and code that isn't used has a tendency to both start breaking down after a while and add complexity to code that indeed is in use. Less is more, and all that.



		karl

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe go to the end of this page: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/prevayler-discussion
_______________________________________________
"Databases in Memoriam" -- http://www.prevayler.org