Re: is trunk stable compared to release 0.21 ?

Trunk is stable only if we exclude locale bundles with errors
(reported on our maven instance). Also LDAPSecurity have some
unpredictable behaviour (password change, expiration and so on), also
current implementation (without my patch apply) don't support ldap
auth (criticaly for MS AD) - as for me it should be marked as
Experimental, before we complete or rewrite to make use as primary
security service.

We use scarab trunk for more then 7 month. No crashes or critical
errors occurred (we don't use report functionality)

Maybe your should copy trunk to branch, and work on it?

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Hussayn Dabbous
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi;
>
>  I know, trunk is always considered a risk...
>  But is it worth a try to use it as a replacement
>  for 0.21 ? I ask, because i want to start new
>  functionality now, but i prefer to start right
>  from trunk, instead of our 0.21 release, so that
>  Scarab can profit as a whole from  my next 2 months
>  work...
>
>  Do i have to be prepared for any known and severe problems ?
>  (I can live with the normal risk of getting unexpected behaviour
>  from untested development version...)
>
>  Any input for decision making is welcome.
>
>  regards, hussayn
>  --
>  Dr. Hussayn Dabbous
>  SAXESS Software Design GmbH
>  Neuenhöfer Allee 125
>  50935 Köln
>
>  tel.: +49 221 560 11 0
>  fax.: +49 221 560 11 20
>
>  mailto:[email protected]
>  http://www.saxess.de
>  http://www.saxess.com
>  http://www.saxess.org
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>