Re: Proposal for a significant change in the personel section!

Jorge Uriarte wrote:
>>> two reasons behind user-attributes:
>>> - First: Act as "normal" attributes to hold info of the relationship
>>> of given users with the users.
>>>
>>>       
>> Any chance to give a more in depth description ;- ? What are "given
>> users" and what is the difference
>> between "given users" and "users" ? I am certain this is a typo but i
>> can't figure out, how to resolve this ;-(
>>
>>     
>
> haha sorry, KISS, I must try to simplify and stop using so many adjectives :P
> I was using the third meaning (which has the same meaning in spanish)
>
> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/given%5B1%5D
>
> So, forget the "given", take it as a plain "users". Does it make sense now?
>
>   
not for me. when i forget the "given" i end up with:

Act as "normal" attributes to hold info of the relationship
of users with the users.


When i replace the "given" by "plain", i end up with:

Act as "normal" attributes to hold info of the relationship
of plain users with the users.


And now i am fully confused. But maybe its a bit late now ;-)

------------------------------------------------------
http://scarab.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=456&dsMessageId=2360488

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].