RE: Proposal for a significant change in the personel section!

Hahaha, sorry, I thought you were complaining about the word "given" and I did not get my own initial typo: "of Users with the Issues", Hussayn, that was all.

(and now I nominate this thread for the "Dumbest Thread 2009" award)


----- Mensaje original -----
De: Hussayn Dabbous <[email protected]>
Enviado: martes, 09 de junio de 2009 1:05
Para: [email protected]
Asunto: Re: Proposal for a significant change in the personel section!


Jorge Uriarte wrote: 
two reasons behind user-attributes:
- First: Act as "normal" attributes to hold info of the relationship
of given users with the users.

      
Any chance to give a more in depth description ;- ? What are "given
users" and what is the difference
between "given users" and "users" ? I am certain this is a typo but i
can't figure out, how to resolve this ;-(

    
haha sorry, KISS, I must try to simplify and stop using so many adjectives :P
I was using the third meaning (which has the same meaning in spanish)

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/given%5B1%5D

So, forget the "given", take it as a plain "users". Does it make sense now?

  not for me. when i forget the "given" i end up with:
Act as "normal" attributes to hold info of the relationship
of users with the users.


When i replace the "given" by "plain", i end up with:

Act as "normal" attributes to hold info of the relationship
of plain users with the users.


And now i am fully confused. But maybe its a bit late now ;-)

------------------------------------------------------
http://scarab.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=456&dsMessageId=2360560

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].