Re: [Sisc-users] Re: java stack trace
Matthias Radestock <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.sisc.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | LShift Ltd |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] wrote: > I believe the example he was referring to fit into neither category. It fits exactly into the second category. What I was pointing out is that the s2j module already exports a function for displaying the stack trace, so there is no need to write your own code to do it (which is what your example did). > In > cases where a RuntimeException is thrown from a Primitive, we did not > record the Java exception previously. Recording it will be necessary > for the IO Conditions SRFI for example. I wonder whether we should change S2J's exception reporting mechanism ("the message is the exception") to the one you introduced for primitives ("the java-exception is the exception"), or vice versa, or neither. Matthias. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01