Re: srfi-1 iota
Matthias Radestock <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.sisc.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dan <[email protected]> writes: > The reference implementation of SRFI-1 (the one that > uses let-optionals, and is still on the web) allows > (iota count start), with step defaulting to 1. That > usage is not implied by the SRFI text, but other > Schemes (for example guile and Chicken) allow it > (presumably because they use the ref. implementation). > SISC apparently modified the ref. implementation to > eliminate let-optionals, and in the process disallowed > (iota count start). Was this intended ? No. Fixed in CVS. Matthias.