Re: syntax-case and modules

I asked the same question on comp.lang.scheme, as
Chicken showed the same symtomps. Turns out that
syntax-case from release 6.9c onwards supports a
(meta) prefix for just this purpose, i.e. 

"tells the expander that any variable definition
resulting from the definition is to be an expand-time
definition available only on the  right-hand sides of
other meta definitions and, most importantly, to 
transformer expressions."

Why not upgrade to the latest psyntax.ss from
http://www.cs.indiana.edu/chezscheme/syntax-case/ ? :)
I will try to build a custom SISC version and see how
it works.

-- Dan

--- "Scott G. Miller" <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 12:40:20PM -0700, Dan wrote:
> > It seems that a syntax-case macro cannot use a
> > function defined in the same module:
> 
> You need to let the module system know that the
> macro needs the 
> function, eg:
> 
> (module mod ((mac1 f))
>   ... )
> 
> 	Scott
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642