Re: [skinlf-dev] Follow-up on laf-plugin proposal

Hi Kirill,
Kirill Grouchnikov wrote:
 > The current separation follows approach in the Metal LAF (which may or
 > may not be a good choice depending on whether the particular LAF extends
 > Metal). I can easily add an additional function to the PluginManager
 > combining all three calls as you suggest.
In the end it's all pushed into the same map.

 >
 > Another thing that you mention should most probably be added to the
 > signature of LafPlugin - the uninitialize (most probably making the
 > reset redundant).
I think that's right. It constraints getDefaults to being called only 
once after a theme change, but that's OK for me.

 >
 > Erik, Robert, Pattrick - what do you think about uniting the mentioned
 > three functions into a single one?
I think that's a good idea. Fortunately there aren't many plugins around 
yet. Otherwise this change of the public interface would be really a 
nightmare ;)

Cheerio,
   Robert