Moving Monitor interfaces out of impl

Currently, in Pico-compatible components, the <Component>Monitor 
interface is part of impl.  If one sees is a replacement for logging
it could be justified.  But as Paul noted Monitor is a much more
generic interface which could be used also for purposes other than
logging, so would deserve the "API" status.

Any objections to moving the ThreadPoolMonitor and NetServeMonitor
interfaces to API, while leaving the concrete classes in impl?

Cheers




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf