Re: Jervlet is here
peter-4lf8KW9E9MLMqX/[email protected] Tue, 28 Oct 2003 16:48:56 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.spice.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <034601c39d17$2d2c1c20$21e7809d@fisg2> |
Hi, From: "Ryan Hoegg" <[email protected]> > OK I committed what I have now. woohoo! > What's generally done when one forks something from a sandbox? Do we > write up something on a history.xdoc describing where we got the code? We could but probably not really worth it in the long run. I suspect by the time it gets released that jerlet will have been reworked significantly such that there is little if anything from the original codebase - thats jusyt my suspicions though. > Do we include the original developers in the <developers/> list in the > POM? I would. > Just want to avoid stepping on toes, I think the Apache license > only requires us to state that this includes code from Apache. yep. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/