Rio performance ?

Hi all

Perhaps this is not the right forum for this mail - apologies if this is the
case.

Part of our customer's requirements indicate that we must provide real-time
dynamic provisioning capabilities. (i.e. when consumers are not consuming
fast enough - start more consumers, when consumers are "going hungry" stop
some consumers)

As ever, we're reluctant to re-invent wheels - and have been looking at Rio.

We've been comparing the ubiquitous "RayTrace" examples that come both with
the Rio download, and the Jini starter kit - and have noticed a big
performance differential between both examples.

This degradation expresses itself - as more workers are started.
Obviously we are aware that Rio will consumer CPU cycles - but has anyone out
there observed similar behaviour? Care to share your experiences?

We'd be interested to know if anyone has performed any form of "platform
sizing". It would be good to know what platform specifications/sizes they
have decided on when using Rio in combination with their "applications".

Thanks for any information in advance
Paul McGrath

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] and include in the body
of the message "signoff JAVASPACES-USERS".  For general help, send email to
[email protected] and include in the body of the message "help".

To view past JAVASPACES-USERS postings, please see:
http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/javaspaces-users.html

JDC members can download the JavaSpaces(tm) Technology from:
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/products/jini/