Re: maxEntries in contents()

Gregg Wonderly wrote:
> Mark Brouwer wrote:
>
>> I prefer the spec as javadoc and why not have the non-normative text as
>> another custom tag, in the same way as the current implementation
>> details are part of the JTSK javadoc.
>
>
> A custom tag for separation would be fine too.  I was just going from the
> perspective that John's words seemed to indicate that he didn't want the
> JavaDoc
>  to contain both, because of the "spec" part of editing any text therein.

A suitable tag could be an option

>> As proper IDEs can generate the javadoc on demand when they have the
>> source code available (Ctrl Q e.g. in IntelliJ) or provide the ability
>> to link in external javadoc I think javadoc is the place to put the
>> stuff.
>
> This is a benefit of the "participation age" with IDEs that actually
> participate in the development cycle instead of impeding it :-)

IDE! IDE! you will have to pry emacs from my cold dead fingers :-)

[please note, if required by your religion please feel free to
":1,$s/emacs/vi/g"]

--
BTW, if you want to reply to this message, please direct your reply
to the list, thanks

John McClain                                    [email protected]
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Burlington, MA

Emacs may rarely run more than once, but it runs nearly forever.
If I'm logged on, Emacs is running.  It's not just an editor; it's
not just an OS slumming as an editor; it's a lifestyle.
     Dennis O'Connor - [email protected]

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] and include in the body
of the message "signoff JAVASPACES-USERS".  For general help, send email to
[email protected] and include in the body of the message "help".

To view past JAVASPACES-USERS postings, please see:
http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/javaspaces-users.html

JDC members can download the JavaSpaces(tm) Technology from:
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/products/jini/