Re: JiniProposal -> BraintreeProposal

On Wed, 2006-10-25 at 14:22, James Grahn wrote:
<snip
> Of course, I realize time might also be a consideration, so perhaps we
> should just learn to live with Project Braintree.   Just be sure to put
> in the FAQ immediately that we have nothing to do with the tree data
> structure per se.   And "brain" is a non sequitur too, though a less
> harmful one.

By comparison, a rare musical instrument called a xalam has _what_ to do
with transforming documents, exactly (even if it is mis-spelled)?

At least Braintree has some history behind it, following on from Porter
and Davis, etc.  I don't see a problem with "Braintree is the latest
implementation of the Jini dynamic networking specifications, now
undergoing incubation at Apache".

General Patton said "A good plan violently executed now is better than a
perfect plan executed next week".  File the incubator proposal and let's
get on with it!

Greg.

--
Greg Trasuk, President
StratusCom Manufacturing Systems Inc. - We use information technology to
solve business problems on your plant floor.
http://stratuscom.com

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] and include in the body
of the message "signoff JAVASPACES-USERS".  For general help, send email to
[email protected] and include in the body of the message "help".

To view past JAVASPACES-USERS postings, please see:
http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/javaspaces-users.html